The Telangana High Court granted interim relief to IAS officer Smita Sabharwal against the P.C. Ghose Commission’s report on the Kaleshwaram project, citing violations of due process.

Court Protects Sabharwal from Commission Fallout

The Telangana High Court has stopped the state government from taking any steps against IAS officer Smita Sabharwal on the basis of the Justice P.C. Ghose Commission’s findings regarding the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Project. The interim relief will remain in place until the next hearing on October 7. Sabharwal argued that the Commission made defamatory allegations without serving her notices as required under law, thereby violating natural justice. She maintained that she neither had authority over project decisions nor played a role in administrative approvals, yet her name was unfairly dragged into the controversy.

Her counsel contended that the report was arbitrary and designed to damage her reputation, especially as it was tabled in the Assembly before being sent to the CBI. The state, however, claimed no action was currently planned against her, though it sought more time to respond.

This case once again highlights how inquiry commissions can be misused as political tools, often bypassing legal safeguards to target individuals. The government’s move to publicize the report before judicial review not only weakens institutional credibility but also risks turning governance into vendetta. For citizens, it raises a serious question: are commissions ensuring accountability, or merely becoming instruments to settle scores?

So, the protection is not a clean chit. It is a temporary safeguard to ensure that her career, reputation, or legal standing isn’t harmed while the High Court examines whether the Commission’s findings were legal and valid.